Planetary defense test deflected an asteroid but unleashed a boulder swarm::A UCLA-led study of NASA’s DART mission determined that the strategy presents previously unanticipated risks.

  • Madrigal@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    44
    ·
    1 year ago

    So the thing that was meant to be a learning experience turned out to be a learning experience?

  • Elephant0991@lemmy.bleh.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Somehow, I found the lead scientist’s statement and the associated news to be click-baiting. Right, you crash something into a composite rock, and expect no ejecta from it. That’s pretty freaking believable. That’s like, the most basic physics you can expect from it. This is just to grab your attention so we can get more funding (which they may deserve, even if this is irritating), folks.

    • Loulou@lemmy.mindoki.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Wasn’t it boulders like laying around on the asteroid? Held there by microgravity, and thus knocked in all directions at the impact?

      I mean debris from the impact, yes, “boulders” laying around, no I didn’t expect that :-)

      • Elephant0991@lemmy.bleh.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        OK. Then. I guess the summary would be like, the asteroid was more loose than we though, and we had no idea how the boulders got ejected from the surface because our impact.

  • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Totally totally totally unanticipated that one. Like every discussion about asteroid defence ever anticipated exactly this kind of scenario.

  • dustyData@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Unanticipated? I’m sure I can pull out a very serious and scientific simulation that predicted this exact event from 1979. It’s called Asteroids I think.

  • freecandy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    Pretty cool they were able to measure the change in velocity of an object 6 million miles away with millmeter/second resolution. Not cool that it only slowed down a few mm/second though

    • Thorndike@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Actually, a few mm/sec is quite a lot. That could easily be more than enough to deflect an asteroid from hitting earth. That few mm/sec will accumulate over the time it takes the asteroid to travel six million miles.

      • freecandy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Well you would need the vector to predict that not just the speed (which they likely have, didn’t see it in the article), but pretty cool nonetheless

  • Skyrmir@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Sounds like the gravity tug or thruster methods might end up being the better solution.

    • Diplomjodler@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      Asteroids may be detected very late when they’re already near earth. Breaking up a large rock into a lot of smaller ones may not be a big help. But all of this has been known for a very long time.