Send me bad puns. Good puns welcome too.

  • 3 Posts
  • 2.38K Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 13th, 2024

help-circle

  • The country of Tiananmen Square?

    True but irrelevant.

    The country whose people practically develop an ever-changing coded language to avoid big brother coming down hard on any sort of criticism?

    Yes. I never said that China tolerates criticism, but that doesn’t mean Chinese people live in fear of their government. An incompetent government will have criticism coming from every which way, necessitating draconian measures and exaggerated crackdowns, which does lead to fear (ask me how I know). This isn’t the case for China because, despite their faults and the evil shit they get up to, Chinese people are generally satisfied with their governance. Fear isn’t an automatic result of authoritarianism; it appears when there’s too little carrot and too much stick.

    The country that runs “reeducation” camps for many who do get caught?

    True but irrelevant.

    The country that has Uyghurs and Tibetans to blame “within,” and Japan without? Or the US?

    Source? Not for their oppression of Uighurs and Tibetans, or rivalry with the US and Japan, I know about these, but that they’re using any of these as scapegoats for their own troubles. Oppression can be motivated by things other than scapegoating, and it’s not like China is lacking in real reasons to oppose the US and Japan. Without something that corroborates your claim this is just a non-sequitur.

    Where senior cadres of the party magically grow richer?

    This is just a non sequitur. Senior CCP officials are rich, but the other half of your claim “everyone else pretty much won’t” goes against everything we know about Chinese economic growth.













  • TIL that different Fediverse clients have different character limits. Now I’m starting to feel like my 5000-character limit is a scam.

    The long-term, the economy gets fucked, but the short-term, the aristocratic family’s balance books look fantastic.

    I wonder why this sounds familiar. Must be the wind. That aside thanks for the excellent write up. I’m kinda starting to get Romaboos.


  • So I’ve got a few questions if you don’t mind.

    the structure of the economy meant that a significant amount of benefit still reached the exploited poor, peasants and urban laborers alike.

    Can you explain how exactly that worked? How would an average Roman peasant benefit from Roman conquests or trade?

    Coloni were not nearly as productive as previous agricultural systems, for the obvious reason that they benefitted very little from their work.

    If they were less productive, then why did the aristocracy accept this system? Or did the ability to exploit their coloni more make up the difference? Did this make them meaningfully richer?

    More generally, from what I understood it seems the Western Empire went through a cycle of giving more power to the aristocracy and everything getting worse. Was this avoidable or would it be accurate to think of the late Western Empire as an anachronism giving more and more power over to the aristocracy in to temporarily sustain itself until it eventually collapsed? Why did this happen in the West while the East managed to survive?