The wacky waving inflatable arm-flailing tube man can be characterized as a 3D slice of a conscious, four dimensional entity (with balls)

It worked!!

fuck

We’re not sending our best

PECK

That sounds like it’s going to get real messy real fast

He later died of lacerations from the broken window

Look how they massacred my boy

OR IS IT??

This is exactly why giving ID scans to online sevices is a terrible idea, even ignoring the privacy aspect.

Dark yellow! Yellow is inherently bright and sunny, when you try to make it dark it becomes a hideous contradiction.

While that is true, two properly selected objects (such as the ones mentioned above) can reduce the effect of air resistance to levels negligible to human perception, demonstrating that heavier objects do not intrinsically fall faster.

Here is my favorite treatise on that subject: I, We, Waluigi: a Post-Modern analysis of Waluigi by Franck Ribery

Gozz is correct. You’re misunderstanding the nature of a digital signal. What the author did was convert a digital signal to an analog signal, store that analog signal on a bird, then record that analog signal. Whether it was redigitized after the fact is irrelevant. It is not a digital process end-to-end. This is the same as if I were to download a YouTube video, record that video on a VHS tape, then redigitize that video. Not only would the end result not be a bit for bit match, it wouldn’t be a match at all despite containing some of the same visual information, because it would be the product of a digital-analog-digital conversion.

I think a bowling ball would actually just be a solid topologically. The finger holes are just indentations rather than holes that go all the way through. IANAT, though.

Technically no, this photographer is putting flowers under a blacklight and photographing them, resulting in a picture of basically what a human would see IRL in that scenario (aside from things like contrast/exposure variances, etc). It’s not really the same as what UV sensing animals would see. These photos are of regions of the flower converting UV light into human-visible visible light (via fluorescence, same thing as a blacklight poster). UV sensing animals are seeing actual ultraviolet being reflected by the flower as well as visible light, so it’s not the same thing.

Damn, that’s poetry