I’ll allow it as they are already shipping people out on military aircraft. Almost 100 to Guatamala already.

It’s worth noting that these raids and arrests are warrantless which is in violation of the Constitution.

As a matter of public policy, yes, it’s 100% true and the fact that he got a cease fire done the last day of his administration proves that.

I thought Sony had a contract to make physical releases of the Disney material.

https://forum.blu-ray.com/showthread.php?t=371377

https://thedigitalbits.com/columns/my-two-cents/030124-1330

https://variety.com/2024/film/news/disney-sony-pysical-media-dvd-blu-ray-disc-business-1235917294/

It is absolutely a blatant falsehood because Biden is on the public record over and over advocating a cease fire and a two-state solution.

You can’t simultaneously advocate a two-state solution while also attempting to exterminate one of the states.

Biden believes both Palestine and Israel have a right to exist. That is NOT genocidal.

Israel believes they should have full control of Gaza, the West Bank, the Golan Heights and Southern Lebanon and will kill anyone who tries to defy them.

Name does not check out.

Again, Biden’s direct quotations are not subjective. He legitimately believes that Israel has the right to defend themselves and supplied support to do that.

Israel misappropriated that support.

Biden acted in good faith, Israel did not.

I don’t see how it’s any plainer than that.

Was Biden STUPID to do it? Absolutely. That doesn’t mean he’s the one engaging in genocide, Israel is.

“discovery of an erosion channel stretching from the Gulf of Cadiz to the Alboran Sea in 2009.”

Weird they don’t just say “Strait of Gibraltar”. Must have been something to see when that dam burst.

I’m also fascinated by the theory that the flood of Noah and Gilgamesh may have been a similar event from the Mediterranean into the Black Sea, which apparently been fresh water at one point before becoming inundated.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea_deluge_hypothesis

Zilch!

The spider and web is fine… simple design.

The artwork and shading on the skull is very good and the subtle pattern over and behind it is really interesting, almost kaleidoscopic, but I think the pattern might be lost over time.

I can’t say enough good things about the Ministry of Ungentlemanly Warfare:

https://youtu.be/zvwDen1Wrx8

Mind blowing aspects:

1. It’s a true story.

2. Ian Fleming was there for it and used it as the inspiration for James Bond.

3. In the two real missions dramatized for the film, nobody got killed, but where’s the fun in that?

Boob window is fine, but the long gloves and boots look a little goofy… not sure what to think there.

The actual book has been decent so far though!

You really want to bake your noodle?

Make the same post twice only add one small typo the 2nd time.

Watch which one gets more up otes.

No, they have jurisdiction in the State of Palestine, you know, where the crimes are happening.

https://asp.icc-cpi.int/states-parties/asian-states/Palestine

Which is how they charged Israel for the ongoing genocide, Israel isn’t an ICC states party either, but you run around committing crimes in a states party, yeah, they do have jurisdiction.

Same for Ukraine and Russia.

https://asp.icc-cpi.int/states-parties/eastern-european-states/ukraine - Member state, Russia is not. Putin gets charged as a war criminal.

So if Putin, like China, started committing atrocities inside his own country, the ICC couldn’t cover it, not an ICC issue.

From your article:

“Prosecutors in The Hague said on Monday that they would not, for the moment, investigate allegations that China had committed genocide and crimes against humanity regarding the Uighurs, a predominantly Muslim ethnic group, because the alleged crimes took place in China, which is not a party to the court.”

They have no legal jurusdiction in China.

No, you can discuss anything you want, but you won’t be allowed to assert blatant falsehoods as true.

Same goes when I remove the arguments about Ukranians being Nazis or how they were the real aggressors after Russia invaded them or how the Uyghur genocide is all made up by Western powers to make China look bad.

Bullshit gets removed, repeated, unrepentent bullshit gets a temp ban. Repeated temp bans get longer and longer until the bullshit is excised.

Again, not a moral viewpoint.

Objectively, by any and all legal definition, Israel is responsible for the genocide in Gaza NOT Biden.

Quoted, and cited. You can go on and on about how you “feel” diferently, but you can’t say that and ignore a legal ruling as being subjective.

Unless, and I’m open to the very real possibility at this point, that you don’t ACTUALLY know the definitions of “objective” and “subjective”.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/objective

1: expressing or dealing with facts or conditions as perceived without distortion by personal feelings, prejudices, or interpretations

The ICC found Israel and Netanyahu responsible for the genocide in Gaza. Factually true. They did not charge Biden. Factually true. Cited above. This is the objective reality of the situation and comments accusing Biden of genocide will continue to be removed as misinformation.

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/subjective

3a : characteristic of or belonging to reality as perceived rather than as independent of mind

4a(1) : peculiar to a particular individual

(2) : modified or affected by personal views, experience, or background

5 : lacking in reality or substance

“I don’t care what the ICC says! I feel different!”

That would be you. We’re done here, it’s like talking to a poorly informed wall.

Again, morality and philosophy are subjective. Legally, which is objective, Biden is not responsible.

It absolutely is, you kept bringing up the subjective vs. objective argument.

The objective truth is the legal rulings from the ICC court cited above.

Your subjective notion of what’s “philosophically true” cannot be objectively proven one way or the other. That’s the very nature of philosophy.

I gave you the citations from Biden stating his reasoning, I gave you the ruling from the ICC. These are all the legal standings surrounding Biden’s support of Israel.

If you want the objective truth, you have it, quoted and sourced. If you choose to reject it, well, I can’t help you with that.

“AHHH-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA-HA!”

I’d add the Sten Mk II S. :)

https://youtu.be/zvwDen1Wrx8