Which will probably be never.

  • @KindaABigDyl@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    291 month ago

    Life is and will always be better writing your own Makefiles. It’s literally so easy. I do not get the distaste. Cmake is arcane magic. Bazel is practically written in runes. Makefile is a just a glorified build script, but where you don’t have to use a bunch of if statements to avoid building everything each time.

    • @TheReturnOfPEB@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      15
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      really anyone worth their salt should write perl code to generate makefiles depending on the phase of the moon and if you sacrificed a $chicken, a @chicken, or a %chicken at runtime.

    • @CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      6
      edit-2
      1 month ago

      It’s one of those massively elegant concepts of the past that’s become unfashionable to learn pretty much just do to time and ubiquity.

    • @leggettc18@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      51 month ago

      That works until you need to support Visual Studio or Xcode. Then you either maintain their stuff manually too, or you get CMake to generate all three. I don’t love it but it solves the problem it’s meant to solve. The issue is people using it when they don’t need to.

      • @Hack3900@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        31 month ago

        I’m not familiar with either why can’t you use Make with VS or Xcode? Can you not set them up to have whatever build bind call Make ?

      • @zaphod@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        31 month ago

        Xcode implies MacOS, you can use make there too, just beware that some commandline tools take different arguments on BSDs.

      • You can build with mingw64 built with msvc and use more or less the same Makefile. As for Xcode… well, there’s not really a good reason to support Mac. On principle I wouldn’t even try