• lousyd@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    I bet for a long while you’d be like, “What even are dollars?”, since they hadn’t been invented yet.

    • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      5 days ago

      Nevermind dollars. What about inflation? $5000/day in 1900 would be worth $187,000 today. That’s $68M/year.

      You’d need, what? 15 years to get a billion at that rate. You’d also be accusing money faster than Rockefeller.

      I have to wonder where all that wealth would even be coming from.

      • CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        5 days ago

        Presumably the same place real rich people get it today. Gradually inflating the currency so that even if they’re not directly stealing from you the increase in their wealth comes from the lessening of value of your, mine, and everyone elses money.

        • UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          Gradually inflating the currency

          Gradual inflation that happens under the national growth rate is fine. You need more currency moving at a faster rate in an expanding economy.

          Gradual inflation in a contracting national growth rate is a huge problem.

          Thomas Picketty lays this all out mathematically in “Capitalism in the 21st Century”, and builds a strong economic case for a high graduated tax rate as a means of tying inflation back to real economic growth.

      • BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        5 days ago

        You’d also be accusing money faster than Rockefeller.

        It was the 20 dollar bill that killed the butler, with a candelabra in the hall!