Tesla Using 'Full Self-Driving' Hits Deer Without Slowing, Doesn't Stop
jalopnik.com
How's that computer-vision-only approach working out for you, Tesla?

OK, its just a deer, but the future is clear. These things are going to start kill people left and right.

How many kids is Elon going to kill before we shut him down? Whats the number of children we’re going to allow Elon to murder every year?

  • chaogomu@lemmy.worldEnglish
    392·
    2 months ago

    Then it’s not “Full self driving”. It’s at best lane assistance, but I wouldn’t trust that either.

    Elon needs to shut the fuck up about self driving and maybe issue a full recall, because he’s going to get people killed.

    • Kusimulkku@lemm.eeEnglish
      16·
      2 months ago

      It’s self-driving but you need to supervise it because you are both responsible and because it’s not perfect.

      • chaogomu@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        2 months ago

        but you need to supervise it because you are both responsible and because it’s not perfect

        Not self-driving then. Words have meanings.

        • Kusimulkku@lemm.eeEnglish
          1·
          2 months ago

          Right. Wikipedia defines it as such

          A self-driving car, also known as a autonomous car (AC), driverless car, robotaxi, robotic car or robo-car,[1][2][3] is a car that is capable of operating with reduced or no human input.

          But also

          Organizations such as SAE have proposed terminology standards. However, most terms have no standard definition and are employed variously by vendors and others. Proposals to adopt aviation automation terminology for cars have not prevailed.

          So there’s no one definition. It is driving by itself. You don’t have to do any driving. But you should keep alert so if something happens you can taker over. Seems like it fits with the general use imo but doesn’t fulfill the more stringent definitions.