• Mercuri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    2 months ago

    I mean you’re not wrong but no matter how small an impact it’s still not ZERO emissions, so the guy you’re replying to is technically correct.

    • Godric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      9
      ·
      2 months ago

      Ah yes, good ole technically correct, the weakest and most schlubby shade of correct, whatever would we do without it?

      • Mercuri@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 months ago

        Actually, it’s the best kind of correct. But hey, don’t let all that butt hurt bother you. I hear there’s a cream for that.

        I love that I agreed with you and you STILL felt aggrieved, lol.

        • Godric@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 months ago

          Jokes on you, clown, I’m never butt-hurt, only butt-turned-on!

          Disdaining the “technically correct” pedants is freeing, try it sometime, you might like it ;)