• Telorand@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      73
      ·
      1 month ago

      Hardly. The Fediverse spans multiple apps and services, and it existed before Elon bought Twitter and it will continue existing regardless of what the billionaires do, because it’s not run by just one person.

      The whole point is decentralization, not growth, so unless the billionaires can take out every server hosting an instance, the Fediverse isn’t going anywhere.

      • Tyfud@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        26
        ·
        edit-2
        1 month ago

        This.

        Back in the day this is how the internet worked. Every forum host was just some guy or girl hosting a platform so they coukd build a community with the people and hobbies they love.

        We need to go back closer to that world. The fediverse bridges the gap between the centralized experience, and decentralized management.

        Optimistically, it’s the best of both worlds.

        • Telorand@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 month ago

          I know I can’t ever go back. I donate to my instance, and I actually feel good about it, because I know it’s not going into the pocket of some faceless corporation who’s beholden to its shareholders instead of its customers.

        • dejected_warp_core@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 month ago

          I was gonna say. It’s this exactly. Plus a nice feature of Fediverse stuff is that it can scale down to hobby levels if needed. Venture funded commercial services abhor this and will compromise all kinds of things (e.g. morals, ethics) to keep going at whatever scale they’re at.

    • Rentlar@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      I don’t think it’s the worst outcome or the Fediverse needing to be written off because of this. At least for now BridgyFed is a thing, and it’s not like we have to capture every refugee, Mastodon has thriving and tight-knit communities.

    • Patch@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 month ago

      Considering the fediverse microblogging scene includes Threads, which claims to have hundreds of millions of active users, I’d say its death is greatly exaggerated.

      Yes, I know a lot of Mastodon servers refuse to federate with Threads, and yes I know their active user figures are likely very different from what they claim. But at the end of the day, it’s an ActivityPub microblogging platform with a considerable userbase and a very rich corporate backer.

    • NeoToasty@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      The fediverse is considered ‘over’ when parasitic leeches like Musk and Spez come knocking on Lemmy’s and BlueSky’s doors like “we want growth…please sell to us”.