• RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    24 hours ago

    TBF a nuclear incident is not like burning just one house down. It’s burning down the whole city and making it unusable for a decade or ten.

    • Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      Why not build it in a remote location then?

      Dams can also produce a lot of hydroelectric power, and a catastrophic failure could also destroy an entire town or more. We just don’t build dams upstream of a large town.

    • jaschen@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      22 hours ago

      While 100% true for nuclear, the current state of burning fossil fuels is much MUCH worse.

      • RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        23 hours ago

        Yes, maybe… but the point being they could, and often did, rebuild right where they’d been before. Radiation prevents that.