• LouNeko@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 month ago

    That’s a bad idea because of how reliant small businesses are on social media advertising. A regulation like that would essentially screw over every business that isn’t rich enough to go to bigger advertising venues.

    • ℍ𝕂-𝟞𝟝@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 month ago

      Twitter is not the sole, or even the biggest social media company in Europe. It’s not even in the top 3.

      The advertisement sector will be fine.

    • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      yes… because businesses are more important than democracies…

      you know, not that long ago these coverless books existed that came out every day. they had stories, news, even comics in them. and you know what? they even had advertisements in them!

      social media is a convenience to business. government is not a social convenience.

      • LouNeko@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Businesses are the ones that produce food, medicine, clothes, build houses, print books, provide gas and electricity, build roads, etc. There are businesses that have outlasted monarchies and democracies. I’m not a corpo schmuck but small businesses are the soul of the soul of our society.

        • GreenKnight23@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          1 month ago

          People Businesses are the ones that produce food, medicine, clothes, build houses, print books, provide gas and electricity, build roads, etc. There are businesses that have outlasted their usefulness monarchies and democracies. I’m not a corpo schmuck but and culture is small businesses are the soul of the soul of our society.

          there, I fixed it.

          the purpose of any business is to be profitable, otherwise it’s a charity. businesses have zero philanthropic goals.

          people make a business profitable. People make the products and services. People consume the product.

          no people, no business.

          no government, no people, no business.

          don’t let greed cloud your judgement.

          • LouNeko@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            1 month ago

            Yes a business usually consists of people and is driven by profit, you sted the obvious, but what is your point?

            Do people buy their vacuums from Dyson Ltd. or from a guy named Kevin?

            It’s not just about profits, it’s about accountability. That’s what the different forms of corporations represent. A singular private person can’t and shouldn’t be held accountable for every product the produce. A business is a layer of protection of limited (Ltd.) accountability. How could anybody be motivated to invent or produce anything if a single miss use of your product that causes any harm (intended or not) could lead to you directly being held responsible and possible going to jail. A business on the other hand usually has limited accountability but is also held to a much higher standard of quality and proof than a private individual ever could.