• astrsk@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    12 days ago

    This is the key difference people miss in this discussion. Being able to do the things you want varies so wildly but the system gets out of the way entirely to let you do things. Not sit and endlessly tweak configurations. While for some that might be what they want to do and believe me macOS also has endless configuration parameters to tweak, the class majority just want to do things with the computer as a tool. It’s a subtle nuance but you said it well, it specifically lets you do whatever you want. Editing configs for hours to customize the desktop environment is not the same as being productive with the system.

    • Jumuta@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      11 days ago

      have you tried mint

      that’s the stereotype a lot of people believe but it’s just false imo

      if your hardware is compatible, then it’s as simple as any other os

      • Guy Fleegman@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 days ago

        Mint is very good. Seriously. If I had to daily drive Linux on the desktop, I’d use Mint. But even Mint is a far cry from a Mac in terms of usability and software compatibility.

        I’d also have to go back to x86-64 to use Mint, and that’s a big step in the wrong direction. I’m sure that won’t always be the case, but at the moment, the ARM Linux situation is still quite fragmented.