• Victoria@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    131
    ·
    6 days ago

    Meanwhile Google search results:

    • AI summary
    • 2x “sponsored” result
    • AI copy of Stackoverflow
    • AI copy of Geeks4Geeks
    • Geeks4Geeks (with AI article)
    • the thing you actually searched for
    • AI copy of AI copy of stackoverflow
    • rescue_toaster@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      69
      ·
      6 days ago

      Should we put bets on how long until chatgpt responds to anything with:

      Great question, before i give you a response, let me show you this great video for a new product you’ll definitely want to check out!

    • FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Google search is literally fucking dogshit and the worst it has EVER been. I’m starting to think fucking duckduckgo (relies on Bing) gives better results at this point.

      • Aielman15@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        ·
        6 days ago

        I have been using Duck for a few years now and I honestly prefer it to Google at this point. I’ll sometimes switch to Google if I don’t find anything on Duck, but that happens once every three or four months, if that.

      • GingaNinga@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        6 days ago

        I’m in sciences and the AI overview gives wrong answers ALL THE TIME. If students or god forbid professionals rely on it thats bad news.

        • snooggums@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Isn’t it funny that a lot of people were worried that wikipedia would be unreliable because anyone could edit it, then turned out pretty reliable, but AI is being pushed hard despite being even more unreliable than the worst speculation about wikipedia?

          Being for profit excuses being shitty I guess.

    • sp3ctr4l@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      We have new feature, use it!

      No, its broken and stupid, I prefer old feature.

      … Fine!

      breaks old feature even harder

    • NielsBohron@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      yeah, but at least we can vet that shit better that the unsourced and hallucinated drivel provided by ChatGPT