• kekmacska@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      xorg almost always worked for me. it had some quirks, but startx almost always solves it. And Xorg is supported by much more gui systems and applications, screen recording is also easy with it

      • Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I can’t say I’ve had the same experience. It was always buggy especially with multiple displays and touch screens. What pushed me to Wayland was the much better battery life.

        • kekmacska@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          ok i know that wayland is better for those but it is still not a valid reason to abolish xorg

            • kekmacska@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              17 hours ago

              i really hope so, because if they did, 65% of desktops/wms wpuld become inaccessible, that would really erode my trust with linux

                • kekmacska@lemmy.zip
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  15 hours ago

                  many desktops and wms were only designed for Xorg, as wayland wasn’t anywhere in that time