• nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    20 hours ago

    NASA does not build it’s own rockets (anymore) they make the payloads. NASA will never make rockets as good/cheap as a companies like ULA and SpaceX.

    Take a look at the cluster fuck that is the SLS if you want an example

      • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        Uh, basically no.

        NASA has experiments to run, spaceX has no idea what science NASA is interested in doing. So having SpaceX make the payload doesn’t really make a lot of sense.

        • danc4498@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          So it sounds like they are codependent at this point. The bigger the nasa budget the better for space X.

          • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            13 hours ago

            I mean, that’s always been the case. That’s literally spaceX’s primary job, putting things in space for NASA. It’s the same for every launch provider in the US.

      • nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        17 hours ago

        SpaceX can make the payloads, and they already do in the form of starlink.

        NASA carries out research/experiments something that spaceX probably doesn’t want to compete in since for the most part it does not pay