• Norgur@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    In my eyes, Piped and such are the ideal solution, not peertube. Not, because peertube is bad, but because with using Piped, you can have your videos and you can have them on a FOSS surface, but leave the nasty tasks like paying for enough storage to host all those videos to the data guzzlers who get denied their return. Some real Robin hood shit right there.

    • MHLoppy@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unless you’re also throwing money at YouTube premium (etc), isn’t this by definition unsustainable to do? So it’s not really a viable long-term strategy either.

      Like don’t get me wrong, I don’t want all the tracking and stuff either, but somebody has to pay those server bills. If it’s not happening through straight cash then it’s going to be through increasingly aggressive monetization and cost-cutting strategies.

      • Norgur@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Oh, Reality-Norgur is well aware of that. Yet, I decided to let fantasy-Norgur take over for a bit ;)

        • Moneo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I’m often in conflict about ads. On one hand they are an absolute blight on society, being harmful at best and a nuisance at worst. On the other hand, what the fuck is going to pay for all this shit? We should just nationalize YouTube.

          • thisisawayoflife@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            ·
            1 year ago

            Cities should be doing it, really. Along with municipal broadband and a laundry list of other things that should be done, but aren’t…

          • Norgur@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            nationalize? A global platform? That spells trouble. Big time. I’m assuming you mean “making it owned by the U.S. government”… I as a German take offence to that!

            • Moneo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              I just mean we need a publicly version of YT. I am aware the logistics of this are ridiculous, the global nature of yt as you point out is a major hurdle. No country I’m aware of has even managed to nationalize their infrastructure so… ya.

          • Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, nationalizing YouTube would work, or more so an Internal team, founded by all nations. Btw Germany has some sort of “Youtube”, paid by people and not government founded. It’s very limited as you can’t upload and only watch. The content is also only what is decided by the owners. Theoretically we’d just need to expand that, to allow uploads and get money by more than just the German citizens. I always had that dream, as it would provide a fully ads free platform. Not sure why that isn’t already a thing, as video platforms are an integral part of our society by now.