BDSM, LGBTQ+, and sugar dating apps have been found exposing users’ private images, with some of them even leaking photos shared in private messages.

  • taladar@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    3 days ago

    I know for a fact that a lot of applications made these mistakes before AI was around so while AI is a possibility it is absolutely not necessary.

    • yoshman@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      2 days ago

      I had a test engineer demand an admin password be admin/admin in production. I said absolutely not and had one of my team members change it to a 64-character password generated in a password manager. Dumbass immediately logs in and changes it to admin again. We found out when part of the pipeline broke.

      So, we generated another new one, and he immediately changed it back to admin again. We were waiting for it the second time and immediately called him out on the next stand-up. He said he needs it to be admin so he doesn’t have to change his scripts. picard_facepalm.jpg

      • Serinus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        2 days ago

        How is he not fired? Incompetence and ignorance is one thing, but when you combine it with effectively insubordination… well, you better be right. And he is not.

        • Pika@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          Firmly agree, I don’t believe he should have had access to change these password in the first place unless I’m misunderstanding their definition of test engineer, but if OP had the authority and permission to change the password in the first place, and that person deliberately changed it back to the insecure route again, management would be involved and there would some sort of reprimandment because that’s past ignorance, that’s negligence

          • yoshman@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            2 days ago

            It was an admin account to do regression testing for the admin interface and functions before prod releases.

            I had my guys enable/disable the account during the testing pipeline so people can’t login anymore.

            • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              2 days ago

              Why would you have regression on prod? Or why would you care what the password is on staging environments?

              We have our lower environments (where all testing happens) on a VPN completely separated from prod, and testing engineers only ever touch those lower environments. Our Ops team manages all admin prod accounts, and those are completely separate from lower environment accounts.

              So I guess I’m struggling to understand the issue here. Surely you could keep a crappy password for pre-prod testing? We even create a copy of prod as needed and change the admin accounts if there’s something prod-specific.

              • yoshman@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                2 days ago

                The production database gets down-synced to the lower environments on demand, so they can test on actual production datasets. That would require us to manually remake this user account every time a dev down-syncs the database to a lower environment.

                The customer is paranoid, as the project is their public facing website, so they want testing against the actual prod environment.

                We don’t mange the SSO, as that is controlled by the customer. The only local (application specific) account is this account for testing.

                • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  2 days ago

                  That would require us to manually remake this user account

                  That sounds fine? Just add it to the script when down-syncing. Or keep auth details in a separate DB and only sync that as needed (that’s what we do).

                  The customer is paranoid, as the project is their public facing website, so they want testing against the actual prod environment.

                  That’s the main problem then, not this testing engineer. We do test directly on prod, but it’s not our QA engineers doing the testing, but our support staff and product owners (i.e. people who already have prod access). They verify that the new functionality works as expected and do a quick smoke test to make sure critical flows aren’t totally busted. This covers the “paranoid customer” issue while also keeping engineers away from prod.

                  Maybe you’re doing something like that now, idk, but I highly recommend that flow.

                  • yoshman@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    2 days ago

                    We resolved it by making him use pipeline vars for his scripts. Like we told him to do in the beginning.

                    He fought it because he wanted his scripts the same for all projects. Including hard coded usernames and passwords. So, it was mostly his fault.

        • yoshman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          2 days ago

          He was a subcontractor, so technically, he’s not our employee.

          I bubbled it up the chain on our side, and it hasn’t happened since.

      • Pika@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        my main question in this is, why does a test engineer have the credentials to change an admin password in production. Like I get that he needs to test things but I doubt he needs access to changing profile/account settings

        • yoshman@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 days ago

          He had to do admin functionality regression tests before prod releases to make sure nothing broke.

          The system uses SSO for logins for everything else.

          He is a subcontractor who was using scripts for all his projects. I told him he really needs to use env vars for creds.