• kattenluik@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    I really, really hope you understand that your comment is entirely useless and just spamming.

    • morphballganon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      No, their comment is correct. Water is indeed wet.

      If you take issue with them stating an obvious fact, perhaps instead you could take issue with the OP, which did the same thing.

      • darcy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        why is this downvoted ? do people not understand that water is wet, or that large amounts of sugar is bad for you ? sand is considered sandy, so why wouldnt water be considered wet ?

        • smooth_tea@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s downvoted because the research is much more nuanced than “too much sugar bad”. And because those kinds of comments reek of know-it-all attitude through oversimplification.

            • smooth_tea@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              It is already specifically about fructose. That in itself is a distinction that is swiftly overlooked in the comments. Not to mention that what is discussed is more about the action of the substance, and not necessarily the amount.