Daft_ish@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 1 year agoThey use to tell us we couldnt trust Wikipedia. Now we know. Wikipedia is the only website you can trust.message-squaremessage-square328fedilinkarrow-up11.18Karrow-down1119
arrow-up11.06Karrow-down1message-squareThey use to tell us we couldnt trust Wikipedia. Now we know. Wikipedia is the only website you can trust.Daft_ish@lemmy.world to Showerthoughts@lemmy.world · 1 year agomessage-square328fedilink
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up20arrow-down1·1 year agothere is a bureaucratic machine for dealing with this kind of problem
minus-squareThrowawayPermanente@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down3·1 year agoBut what do we do if every level of that machine is completely controlled by those people?
minus-squarecommie@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up15arrow-down3·1 year agoit’s not. there are boards on Wikipedia specifically for calling in neutral editors.
minus-squareFlax@feddit.uklinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 year agoYep, generally different editors focus on different subjects.
there is a bureaucratic machine for dealing with this kind of problem
But what do we do if every level of that machine is completely controlled by those people?
it’s not. there are boards on Wikipedia specifically for calling in neutral editors.
Yep, generally different editors focus on different subjects.