• adeoxymus@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    Officially wouldn’t this be the normal usage of we? In royal we it would mean “I” right?

    • dalekcaan@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Yeah, or more specifically “God and I,” since monarchs were ostensibly the mouthpiece of God.

    • LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yeah she actually means the Pluralism Benevolentiae. E.g. when a nurse is saying “We go to the toilet now, aren’t we?” but it actually means “You must go to the toilet but I will be there with you”.

      There is also the Pluralis inclusivus like in scientific texts. Which I personally find really weird.