TriflingToad@sh.itjust.works to Firefox@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months ago"the only browser that's not evil" What are your thoughts?sh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square15linkfedilinkarrow-up114arrow-down114file-text
arrow-up10arrow-down1image"the only browser that's not evil" What are your thoughts?sh.itjust.worksTriflingToad@sh.itjust.works to Firefox@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square15linkfedilinkfile-text
minus-squareCrayonDevourer@lemmy.worldBannedlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·10 months agoI’d say they’re still not evil, they unfortunately just let themselves be captured by an evil company to keep them afloat.
minus-square𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down2·10 months agoAny company who pays their CEO $6.9 million dollars - a thousand times the salary of their lowest white-collar employee - can’t claim to be not evil.
minus-squareBahnd Rollard@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·10 months agoGoogle does that because you cant use Safari if your not on a fruit device and the feds will dust off the anti-trust book and throw it at them ar mach 6 otherwise.
I’d say they’re still not evil, they unfortunately just let themselves be captured by an evil company to keep them afloat.
Any company who pays their CEO $6.9 million dollars - a thousand times the salary of their lowest white-collar employee - can’t claim to be not evil.
Google does that because you cant use Safari if your not on a fruit device and the feds will dust off the anti-trust book and throw it at them ar mach 6 otherwise.