weird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 2 months agoMulti-track driftingsub.wetshaving.socialimagemessage-square25linkfedilinkarrow-up1689arrow-down111
arrow-up1678arrow-down1imageMulti-track driftingsub.wetshaving.socialweird@sub.wetshaving.social to memes@lemmy.world · 2 months agomessage-square25linkfedilink
minus-squareKekzkrieger@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·2 months agoShareholders first. Nothing second.
minus-squarejumping_redditor@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down4·2 months agoexactly why private ownership is morally better, no shareholders to expect reasons for actions
minus-squareEmpricorn@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down1·2 months agoDo you think an obscenely wealthy individual owner vs a publicly-traded company owned by a group of them solves the fundamental issue?
minus-squarejumping_redditor@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·2 months agomakes it more of the owner’s personal choice, rather than having to come up with a justification to the shareholders.
minus-squaresfxrlz@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·2 months agoBut that’s good because wealth and power aren’t known to corrupt and change people right?
Shareholders first. Nothing second.
exactly why private ownership is morally better, no shareholders to expect reasons for actions
Do you think an obscenely wealthy individual owner vs a publicly-traded company owned by a group of them solves the fundamental issue?
makes it more of the owner’s personal choice, rather than having to come up with a justification to the shareholders.
But that’s good because wealth and power aren’t known to corrupt and change people right?