i_have_no_enemies@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agoScientific progress is declining due to bureaucratization of research. Scientific innovations should make ‘zero to one’ breakthroughs, instead making ‘one to many’ improvements to existing innovationswww.livemint.comexternal-linkmessage-square24fedilinkarrow-up1226arrow-down132
arrow-up1194arrow-down1external-linkScientific progress is declining due to bureaucratization of research. Scientific innovations should make ‘zero to one’ breakthroughs, instead making ‘one to many’ improvements to existing innovationswww.livemint.comi_have_no_enemies@lemmy.world to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square24fedilink
minus-squareTheHolyChecksum@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up13arrow-down3·11 months agoOf course not. Capitalism is only good for a very tiny subset of the population’s bank accounts.
minus-squarei_have_no_enemies@lemmy.worldOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down8·11 months agowhat about creativity? does it promote creativity?
minus-squareDenvil@lemmy.onelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·11 months agoIt promotes money. If creativity happens to align with that, then yes.
minus-squareRichCaffeineFlavor@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·11 months agoRemoved by mod
Of course not. Capitalism is only good for a very tiny subset of the population’s bank accounts.
what about creativity? does it promote creativity?
It promotes money. If creativity happens to align with that, then yes.
deleted by creator
Removed by mod