Lee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agoApple exec defends 8GB $1,599 MacBook Pro, claims it's like 16GB on a PCwww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square149fedilinkarrow-up1280arrow-down10
arrow-up1280arrow-down1external-linkApple exec defends 8GB $1,599 MacBook Pro, claims it's like 16GB on a PCwww.theregister.comLee Duna@lemmy.nz to Technology@beehaw.orgEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square149fedilink
minus-squaremiss_brainfart@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up26·1 year agoThat is exactly what Apple would say, isn’t it
minus-squaremiss_brainfart@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up7·1 year agoThey could just sell appropriately specced computers and make absolute bank like they do anyway, but nooo, that would be too nice of them.
minus-squaremiss_brainfart@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up1·1 year agoApple fans have a very different definition of the word convenience than I do, then. It’s so annoying. They have the whole design industry by their balls with their great displays and perfect colour management in MacOS. Putting more RAM in those models, or just cutting the lower-end models out entirely would do them no harm at all.
minus-squaretoothpicks@beehaw.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5·1 year agoIt’s always nice to have as many legs as possible. I love legs
minus-squarejanguv@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·1 year ago Somewhat stretching the analogy there Your analogy is looking a bit leggy at this point.
That is exactly what Apple would say, isn’t it
Removed by mod
They could just sell appropriately specced computers and make absolute bank like they do anyway, but nooo, that would be too nice of them.
Removed by mod
Apple fans have a very different definition of the word convenience than I do, then.
It’s so annoying. They have the whole design industry by their balls with their great displays and perfect colour management in MacOS.
Putting more RAM in those models, or just cutting the lower-end models out entirely would do them no harm at all.
It’s always nice to have as many legs as possible. I love legs
Your analogy is looking a bit leggy at this point.