fantawurstwasser@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoWomen are anonymously spilling tea about men in their cities on viral appwww.nbcnews.comexternal-linkmessage-square142linkfedilinkarrow-up1333arrow-down124
arrow-up1309arrow-down1external-linkWomen are anonymously spilling tea about men in their cities on viral appwww.nbcnews.comfantawurstwasser@feddit.org to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square142linkfedilink
minus-squareBombOmOm@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up144arrow-down1·2 months agoIt’s fine, no reason to sell the data, the service was literally just breached!
minus-squareGork@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up54arrow-down1·2 months agoDon’t these companies know how to properly configure a database? This seemed like it was completely preventable.
minus-squareryathal@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up67·2 months agoLots of breaches are entirely preventable, but lots of companies don’t like to pay for qualified employees that could prevent them.
minus-squareartyom@piefed.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up27·2 months agoThey don’t care. It’s not their information and there are no consequences.
minus-squareRevan343@lemmy.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·1 month ago Don’t these companies know No. The answer is always no
minus-squareINeedMana@piefed.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoThen how would they sell access in a deniable way?
minus-squareDreamlandLividity@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-21 month agoYou think a company paddling gossip under the guise of “woman safety” would care about protecting personal information? 🤣
minus-squarestarman@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6arrow-down4·2 months agoHahaha, that’s hilarious. I’ve just seen it on /g/ today.
It’s fine, no reason to sell the data, the service was literally just breached!
Don’t these companies know how to properly configure a database? This seemed like it was completely preventable.
Lots of breaches are entirely preventable, but lots of companies don’t like to pay for qualified employees that could prevent them.
They don’t care. It’s not their information and there are no consequences.
No. The answer is always no
Then how would they sell access in a deniable way?
You think a company paddling gossip under the guise of “woman safety” would care about protecting personal information? 🤣
Hahaha, that’s hilarious. I’ve just seen it on /g/ today.
😂