• CherenkovBlue@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    It uses a ton of material to power 73 homes annually (652 feet high and 45 feet in diameter), works best in a desert but requires a lot of water. Yeah, nuclear energy is really threatened by that. Modern microreactors in development make, for example, 1.5 MWe at let’s say 90% capacity factor. Assuming about 1000 kWh/mo for a house, that microreactor, which can fit on the back of a semi truck and be transported down the highway that way, can power 985 homes anually and doesn’t require cooling water (will require water for electrical steam generation).

    Yeah, I will stick with nuclear, thanks.