Meta just announced that they are trying to integrate Threads with ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, etc.). We need to defederate them if we want to avoid them pushing their crap into fediverse.

If you’re a server admin, please defederate Meta’s domain “threads.net

If you don’t run your own server, please ask your server admin to defederate “threads.net”.

  • mtcerio@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Aside from the “moral” argument, can someone ELI5 what harm can a federated threads.net do on other users (like me) and/or instances?

      • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        As opposed to Threads stealing all brands companies and users anyway?

        There’s still advantages to a fediverse and ways to defend against “embrace extend extinguish” if you plan ahead.

        We can’t complain about proprietary networks if we don’t allow others to join our own open ones.

        • bort@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          11 months ago

          As opposed to Threads stealing all brands companies and users anyway?

          The extend-phase is when people migrate to threads, who would have stayed otherwise.

          • xigoi@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            And why would you expect there to be many such people? I’d assume the intersection of people who like the Fediverse and people who like proprietary social media to be pretty small.

          • Eldritch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            11
            ·
            edit-2
            11 months ago

            You think groups that came here largely fleeing Reddit and Twitter are going to be tempted to go to threads? I doubt it very heavily. Threads is more likely to loose people to here if anything.

      • Mario_Dies.wav@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        This is what it’s about, right here. I wish more people would understand this. This is not some loose anti-coporate sentiment or senseless alarm sounding. We have example after example of how corporations like Meta, Microsoft, and Google leverage their power to consume and destroy. To say “we just need to be proactive about stopping them” is naive. We’ve said that so many times, and every time we’ve lost.

        The only way to win is not to play their game. We can’t let them in in the first place.

        Edit: a word

    • Cavemanfreak@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      You should look into Embrace, Extend, Extinguish. I think the biggest fear is that they have so many users that they will just flood all instances with their stuff. This can, in time, lead to a situation where they can defederate from everything else and bring a lot of people with them, since most of the content will have come from Threads.

    • witx@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      11 months ago

      They can absorb large numbers of users and communities and after a while close themselves to the outside. Meaning that once people “need” those communities they’ll have no chance other than go threads.

    • sour@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      threads hab more users than fediverse on one instance

      is cause centralization

    • mtcerio@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      I got a number of answers that sound very weak to me, and basically point to a “fail” of the fediverse in its own nature if threads joins. Kind of disappointing.

      To me, the key idea of the fediverse is that it’s federated and should work as a whole, no matter who joins. Most of the answers below support the opposite. They are basically saying that the fediverse should stay within the “fediverse”, which is exactly what non-federated social media are doing. Meh.

    • LemmyIsFantastic@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      Competition and success. They are just paranoid that it’ll be successful and they can’t control where the project goes without including the majority of users and then developers.