• taaz@biglemmowski.win
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 months ago

    As a primarily python programmer with some embedded C experience, I really liked the promise of Dlang when I first saw it, though somewhat it felt as dead language, especially compared to Rust, Zig or Nim - I would rarely hear about Dlang in my circles and bubbles.

    Let’s hope OpenD takes off, wouldn’t mind tipping my toes in it once again.

    • namingthingsiseasy@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 months ago

      Off-topic, but I’m curious why you would put Nim in that list. While I absolutely love the language, I’ve never heard of anyone using it for anything serious, especially compared to Rust or even Zig. I’d even be surprised if it has more mindshare than D.

      (An absolute shame by the way. Nim looks like an absolutely fantastic language.)

    • lysdexic@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      10 months ago

      I would rarely hear about Dlang in my circles and bubbles.

      That’s hardly a measure of relevance or technical merit. There’s a lot of artificial hype being created around some new projects that have a very tenuous correspondence to their technical merits or problems they actually solve, and social network chatter is hardly a factor in assessing technical merits.

      • taaz@biglemmowski.win
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        For me, it means people are actively using it (making libraries… making the language better) or in general there is some movement behind it and I think that is actually important for open source projects.