Blaze@dormi.zone to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agoMeta just showed off Threads’ fediverse integration for the very first timewww.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square48fedilinkarrow-up1136arrow-down113cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.org
arrow-up1123arrow-down1external-linkMeta just showed off Threads’ fediverse integration for the very first timewww.theverge.comBlaze@dormi.zone to Fediverse@lemmy.worldEnglish · 7 months agomessage-square48fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldtechnology@lemmy.worldtechnology@beehaw.org
minus-squarefcuks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7arrow-down2·7 months agoNot sure what you mean by ethical superiority? There’s some pretty horrible and unethical instances on the fediverse… And I disagree with you that mass numbers of people means success
minus-squarerglullis@communick.newslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down1·edit-22 months agoRemoved by mod
minus-squareprole@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down2·7 months agoI think some of us here might just have a different definition of “success” when it comes to content on the internet. Personally, I don’t agree that, mass numbers of people means success
Not sure what you mean by ethical superiority? There’s some pretty horrible and unethical instances on the fediverse… And I disagree with you that mass numbers of people means success
Removed by mod
I think some of us here might just have a different definition of “success” when it comes to content on the internet. Personally, I don’t agree that,