• adrian783@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        this is a super-reach, why don’t we deal with AI indistinguishable from human when it happens.

        right now what we have is a language model that is very distinguishable from human so it doesn’t get any human considerations.

        if a monkey or chicken created an artwork, it doesn’t have copyrights, because it’s not human either.

    • Hello Hotel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I like that argument as it applies to our ai, which isnt ment to reject bad ideas or motiefs but to never have a bad idea in the first place. This setup results in the bot’s path of least resistance being to copy someones homework. Nobody wants the bot to do that.

      Someday we may have AI that argument is harder to apply to

      i attempt explain, irrelivant

      text generators have a “most correct” output that looks and behaves simmlar to pressing the first of the keyboard suggested words repeatedly. We add noise, where the bot is on a dice roll forced to add a random letter to it’s output. Like the above example if you typed a 5 letter word every so often instead.