• WarmSoda@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      74
      ·
      2 years ago

      I’m sorry, but you obviously don’t understand wildfires. You should really try reading Tropical Dingdongs, Esq.

    • nyahlathotep@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      Cool! I have no idea what any of that means, but cool! I get the feeling that you really enjoy what you do, and if that’s the case I’m glad for you :3

    • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 years ago

      When you refer to that diagram, is it a way of gauging fire spread risk? Like this grill could start a medium sized fire, and it’s close to a shed which could become big fire, and that could spread to house, etc, etc?

        • ricecake@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          2 years ago

          Well that’s pretty cool, thanks for sharing! :D To repeat to check my understanding, you’re looking at where structures are relative to other structures, their shape and orientation, and how that goes together in a big system to influence general structure survival in a wildfire situation.

          Do you foresee the outcome being something where you could “tune” a neighborhood to be more survivable, or would it end up with too many combinations to be viable?

    • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 years ago

      No no no, I’m an et al, just no any of those particular et al.

      I’m going to steal cite this. I guess it’ll be ‘et al et al.’