• RealFknNito@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    But the point of sarcasm is to be an undertone, using /s makes it a strong overtone to the point you may as well just say “I’m being sarcastic” after you finish.

    It’s about as bad as explaining a joke, which is not a good thing.

    • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      Right, but isn’t that something we effectively do anyway, with tone of voice and body language?

      And if someone doesn’t pick up on our sarcasm in person, do we just let them go on thinking we believe something we actually don’t?

      No. We do go “I was being sarcastic” and then they burst out laughing and go “oh damn, you got me for a second there haha”.

      We announce our sarcasm in a variety of ways regardless of the setting. The point of making it unmissable online, is that if you don’t, there will be fraction of people who walk away having misinterpreted what you were saying. In person we can make sure that doesn’t happen, online in a public forum, not so much.

      And since when is explaining a joke to someone who doesn’t get it, a bad thing? Are you seriously arguing that ruining the joke (whether it is even ruined in the first place is debatable, imo) is too much to trade in for helping people understand?

      • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        I’ve met people who say things that should have a sarcastic inflection - without the inflection.

        Yes, it’s very hard to understand if they’re joking and yes, we sometimes have to ask them if they’re kidding, but not all the time. Some things are so absurd, so outlandish, phrased in such a way that explicitly explaining it was a joke can ruin the joke. Yes, clear communication in some instances should take priority over the joke in cases where being misunderstood as serious would have consequences, social or otherwise.

        But I really don’t think anyone here reasonably believed OP valued a phone with a ten year lifespan over the life of a child, nor that we should be using a foreign country as a waste dump until they’re ‘at capacity’. I think at some point you have to make the determination that something is so absurd that even if you can’t tell it’s sarcasm, you should be able to tell they’re not serious.

        • soloner@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          Would sarcasm without inflection be the same as deadpan? So maybe without the /s it’s deadpan and with the /s it’s sarcasm? :P

          This has been a fun conversation to read. Such nuance.

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          And this still doesn’t account for the nutcases that say this stuff, actually believing it, and then get showered with validation because the rest of us assume it is sarcasm.

          Edit: whether someone is being “too unreasonable to be serious” is unfortunately no longer a reliable way to tell what someone is actually trying to say.

            • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              7 months ago

              Hardly.

              I’m saying satire that doesn’t in some way tell you it’s satire, can’t be distinguished from the genuinely delusional.

              And thereby the way satire tells you it is satire, needs to change. No part of the art requires that there be no way to truly tell, I would argue the opposite.

        • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 months ago

          Agreed, but again, let’s not pretend r/fuckthes has a point in it being dumb and unnecessary.

          Using it removes even the slightest room for misinterpretation. That is always a good thing.

          • RealFknNito@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            7 months ago

            A large majority of the internet is dumb and unnecessary.

            Jokes often rely on you being able to figure them out without explicit explanation, giving room for misinterpretation.

            Removing the potential for misinterpretation is not always a good thing.