Hey all, thought this might be of interest to some here.

Wrote about why I moved from NixOS to Ubuntu after using it for several months on my daily driver. Suspect that this take is likely to be kind of controversial and court claims of skill issues, which might even be true.

Let me know what you think.

          • oessessnex@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            Nope, nix doesn’t ensure or require that the builds are deterministic. It’s not any better in that regard than other package managers.

            • Shareni@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              nix doesn’t ensure or require that the builds are deterministic

              Pin package version and --pure?

              That should already allow it to be ahead of other PMs.

              • oessessnex@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                6 months ago

                A package is reproducible if you use the same inputs, run the build, and get the same outputs.

                The issue is that the build can produce different outputs given the same inputs. So you need to modify the build or patch the outputs. This is something that is being worked on by most distributions: https://reproducible-builds.org/who/projects/

                NixOS is not special in that regard nor are all NixOS packages reproducible.

    • sxt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Nixos is immutable to force system configuration through the declarative nix configs/build system not to limit tinkering.