• Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      25
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 months ago

      I like keeping tabs on it, as they’re really the only ones pushing mainstream high end ARM chips at the moment.

      • smoothbrain coldtakes@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        6 months ago

        Don’t forget about the new Snapdragon X series. I heard they were pretty good, on par and better than M3s.

        • Alto@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          Hoping they have success, but to say that their laptop chips are truly mainstream, at least in the same sense that Apple gives, is a bit generous I feel.

          Obviously the X series has a decent shot at changing that, which I really hope it does.

        • baru@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          6 months ago

          I heard they were pretty good, on par and better than M3s.

          I only saw that claim in an article where they explained that those chips (Snapdragon) aren’t anything special. Apparently yet another case that a company uses misleading benchmarks.

        • sugar_in_your_tea@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 months ago

          I would love something like that in a super small form factor, like a minipc (NUC, minisforum) or SBC (like RockPro64 size) so I could build a small home NAS with lots of power for home lab stuff.

    • fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 months ago

      Advances in Arm chips make the journey of porting software look better for devs, once a project starts porting it gets easier for other architectures (like riscv).

      That and silicon competition is good. Keeps them forced to produce better or cheaper products to compete.

        • UckyBon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          6 months ago

          Then buy similar hardware from a competitor that meets your needs. I mean, Apple was never innovative, so you surely can get something better somewhere else?

          • baru@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            6 months ago

            I mean, Apple was never innovative, so you surely can get something better somewhere else?

            That wasn’t stated by this person, no? It is a common fallacy to disprove a claim that wasn’t made.

            • UckyBon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              6 months ago

              The user only stated they can’t think of a use-case for the hardware, and therefore innovation is useless. They don’t even have to use it.