• testfactor@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    I think this theory of science is so prevalent in this thread because you have to adhere to it in order to dunk on Elon Musk.

    I doubt most of these ardents would have taken this position in a random thread about sea cucumbers or something.

    I like dunking on Musk as much as the next guy, but the amount of double-think people are willing to commit to to do it is always pretty off-putting to me.

    It’s like every ArsTechnica article on SpaceX has people come out of the woodwork to say that their accomplishments are trash and not even worth reporting because of Elon, which, like, you have to be delusional if you don’t think SpaceX is absolutely killing it.

    • thanks_shakey_snake@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Lol I think you’re onto something. Maybe better off sticking to sea cucumber posts.

      It did make me learn some things, though. The person who I was responding to told me to “See any textbook on the Philosophy of Science,” so I did, and I learned about the Demarcation Problem, Logical Positivism, and some new Karl Popper ideas. So, it has not led to a collaborative discussion, but it was pretty interesting, and I’m much more confident now about what’s reasonable to say about what “counts as Science.” Time well spent, IMO.

      (In case you were wondering: Any activity performed while wearing safety goggles or glasses is technically science.)