Leaked Microsoft memo tells managers not to use budget cuts as an explainer for lack of pay rises: ‘Reinforce that every year offers unique opportunity for impact’::Managers are being ordered to dodge employees’ questions about how the latest budget cuts will impact their pay.

  • NatakuNox@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    No companies will always frame any negative situation as the employees fault. It’s gasslighting 101

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      My company tanked last year and I ended up getting laid off, and as part of the process senior leadership owned the budget problems and in my layoff, I was given full pay for 16 weeks and uncontested unemployment (which I did not end up needing), as well as a job recommendation. Fortune 100 company.

      Microsoft fucked up here and this manager memo is ridiculously stupid. This is how you hemorrhage the talent you’re trying desperately to keep during budget shortfalls.

      Companies aren’t supervillains. They’re just people, and people here fucked up.

    • Andy@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I just want to add that my brother had this happen today. He’s a contractor at Aerojet Rocketdyne, and he asked his direct report whether they’ll be renewing his contract next month. They said that they didn’t know, because a high level manager who has never met him or likely seen any piece of his work is still assessing my brother’s performance.

      I pointed out that based on what he knows of the project and his role, he’s fully qualified to answer this question: is it at all possible that they’re invested in the success of the project, but think that letting him go and then starting a totally new contract hire search is going to make the project any less expensive or faster?

      The answer is obvious. They might let him go because they lose interest in this wildly neglected project, but his performance is objectively nowhere near a level where replacing him would save time or money, and if they were serious this decision would’ve been made weeks ago. They clearly have no idea what they’re doing next month and negging him while they try to figure out what the hell their goals are.