• just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    I watched them. There’s nothing there that is aggressive at all. He very clearly laid out and explained the issues with the ideas put forth by the ideas in that paper, and explicitly said why he did it that way (that’s how a colleague in science would note things), and further said if you’re to be taken seriously, you should expect such feedback from peers who are reviewing your work. That’s quite accurate.

    What was your take on this that sounds negative?