• El Barto@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Interesting! Today I learned, then. Thanks.

    Now, and this I’m going to say in a sort-of tongue-in-cheek manner, what’s your opinion on the recent change of the meaning of “literally”? Because that one is definitely less (ha!) than 200 years old.

    • my_hat_stinks@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      According to this list it was used figuratively by Jane Austen, who I believe died more than 200 years ago. That page also claims the earliest known use is 1769, so it’s probably less than 300 years in writing? It’s moot either way, if you’re going for an etymological argument you could go further and say literally should mean anything to do with letters or writing, from the original Latin literalis/litteralis “of or belonging to letters or writing”.

      • El Barto@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I wasn’t going for an ethymological argument. Plenty of examples of words whose meaning veered away from its ethymology.

        But the recent popularization of literally as a synonym of figuratively, well, it literally rustles my jimmies.