If inciting an insurrection towards their own government is an action without legal repercussions, I don’t see how the law would be less lenient about straight up firing a gun at an opponent.

I by no means want any party to resolve to violent tactics. So even though I play with the thought, I really don’t want anything like it to happen. I am just curious if it’s actually the case that a sitting president has now effectively a licence to kill.

What am I missing?

  • cmoney@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    The supreme cunts can just change their ruling whenever they feel like it, so as long as it’s their boss tRump it’s fine but anyone they tRump doesn’t like they’ll just make another decision saying you can’t do that anymore.