• friend_of_satan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    Do they include “fighting with anti patterns and dark patterns” as broken? It’s pretty insane how much misalignment there is between what most people want their computers to do and what the companies want people to do, which seems to largely be “look at ads literally everywhere”.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          10
          ·
          4 months ago

          Well, because it’s still enormously complex and growing, and because, in user applications, comparing today’s XFCE to 2010’s XFCE is sad, and because comparing today’s Gnome to Gnome 2 in its prime is sad, and because comparing today’s KDE, eh, even to KDE4 - the same.

          Because it’s becoming less and less logical, wave after wave people suffering NIH syndrome and\or thinking that mimicking MacOS or Windows is very smart erode it, and because the Web is ugly and becoming uglier.

          And because CWM initial configuration takes 15 minutes to write and forget, and there’s no Wayland compositor which would take the same amount of time to set up for me, with the same easiness of use.

          Anyway, what I wrote in that comment was a subjective feeling and I’m trying to rationalize it retroactively now, which is the same as lying.

          Of course it’s what you said for Windows and MacOS users.

  • Nougat@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    109
    ·
    4 months ago

    How much time do we waste on car problems? Neighbor problems? Political problems? Grocery problems?

    • akilou@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      54
      ·
      4 months ago

      Right and how much time do we save by having computers? Fixing the problems is just the cost of doing business

    • Cocodapuf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah, this seems like a pretty dumb conclusion. I expect that as far back as you look, people always took advantage of tools that save them time. But then they always also spent a fair amount of that time (that they could have been working), just maintaining/fixing/making their tools. I think the truth is that computers are very useful tools, but the maintenance and troubleshooting can be quite time consuming.

      I will continue using computers though.

      • Nougat@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        Using computers and also having to deal with their problems is still far more betterer than not using computers at all.

    • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Also in the context of working, this isn’t just computers. It’s tools in general, and a computer is a type of tool. Problems with your saw? Problems with your batteries? Problems with access to electricity and your extension cords not being long enough? Problem with losing your 10mm sockets? If you’re a trucker or driver the problem could be your vehicle. Etc etc etc.

      This article is stupid. Tools break, they always have and always will. The tools we have now are better than they have ever been. They will probably keep getting more and more efficient, but they will still break. Because tools break.

    • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      23
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Once everything is set up properly it just works tbh. Meanwhile in windows updates broke something every other time.

      • Takumidesh@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        This is so not true unless you are using some super stable old Debian release and aren’t doing complex work.

        Most DEs are super buggy, especially the darling child kde, which right off the bat makes things not super stable.

        Additionally some of the most loved distros are rolling release and inherently unstable.

        Hell, I use multiple distros daily, fedora and slackware, I also use windows for work, windows is by and large more stable in my experience.

        Slackware has kernel panics monthly, kde crashes on fedora, Wayland has too many problems to count, meaning I have to switch to x sessions all the time.

        Most GUI software I use has tons of visual glitches.

        Yes it’s tolerable, that’s why I still use it, but I wouldn’t exactly say it ‘just works’

        I would estimate I restart my fedora computer about 4-5 times more often than than the windows computer, and usually I have to restart fedora because of serious hard crashes (e.g. kde crashes so hard that I can’t even switch to a tty, meaning I need to hard reset)

        • calcopiritus@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          I use KDE on my Linux machine, which means that I cannot develop anything involving the GPU.

          The moment I experiment a little with the API or give it wrong parameters, not only my program crashes, but the whole system freezes and I have to manually press the “power off” button.

          It does happen in windows too, however it’s 100x less unlikely.

          I also had a problem not long ago that crashing my program would not free the RAM, so every time I ran the program (and it crashed), I had 2-3GiB less of RAM. So I had to restart the computer every 10 runs or so.

          Operating systems are supposed to isolate programs and manage their resources. A program crashing under no circumstances should affect any other program. I don’t understand how it can happen.

      • iopq@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        4 months ago

        Really? Because I updated and my wine prefix just broke. That was yesterday.

      • 𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.pub
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m literally dealing with an update issue with this distro lol

        To he fair, it was perfect, literally perfect, until now. And even now, it’s not unbootable, since I can just use the previous image point. Just sucks I can’t update.

    • oo1@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      All 0.4% of the user base or whatever it is? Unless you mean among the population of server admins.

    • Cosmicomical@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      I can’t tell if you are joking. But just in case, my installation worked flawlessly for years.

      • twig@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        I mean, that’s fine, but as a Linux user I’ve fucked around a lot and spent a lot of time fixing mistakes that I did not need to make.

        I think I’m a pretty average Linux user. Who needs something that “just works” when you can break it by trying to add something you don’t need?

      • RickAstleyfounddead@lemy.lol
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m joking I use fedora and its super stable And takes less time for gnome customization which can’t be achieved by windows

  • Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is 100% due to Microsoft, google and Apple. If you dont understand, I’m not defending my position, or explaining further.

    • maxinstuff@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      4 months ago

      Tangent: what’s this trend all about where people will make a statement and then firmly state that they will not answer questions or explain themselves afterwards?

      I’m seeing it everywhere.

    • a4ng3l@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Working server side much? Pretty sure a lot of us spend a lotta time on fixing shit unrelated to either of those 3… Not that it diminishes the merit of our IT support dude that endure due to those 3 indeed.

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        One thing I appreciate about Arch is that it’s quick to set up if you don’t care and still need something kinda controllable.

        Since I don’t reinstall everything every week, I’m fine with Void. But I’ve used Arch for a month or so. It’s sane.

    • oo1@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      4 months ago

      Oracle vies with MS as to who fucks me more often each working week. Cuurrently Oracle is pippng MS for biggest fucker award. If you don’t understand, you’ve never had to use Oracle (front end / web UI products - tbf the back end DB usually works ok).

    • PlexSheep@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Correct, but not how you meant it, fixing my Linux boxes is is my hobby now, so ita not a waste of time anymore.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s actually simple.

      HIG, UX, ergonomics, all that - it doesn’t build up. Acceptable complexity of a pretty mechanical normal 80s’ UI\UX is the same as of a modern one. Humans don’t evolve over decades, they evolve over spans of time which are as good as eternity. They still need the same kind of complexity in tools they use.

      A control panel for a loader that a factory worker should be able to use is as complex as a workflow on a computer can be. And that’s very explicitly accounting for the fact that loader’s or lift’s control panel doesn’t change every fucking day and the user remembers it, so computer UIs should be simpler than those of lifts and loaders!

      You just don’t make UI\UX more complex than that. There are things humans can learn to do, and there are things they often can’t and they shouldn’t.

      The issue is that this creates a bottleneck for clueless project managers, UI designers and such. They can’t throw together some shit in 30 minutes. They have to choose. They have to test. They don’t want that. And no regulation makes them do that, because if a loader has an unclear UI\UX, you might kill someone, while if an email program has that, you’ll just get very nervous.

      • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        A control panel for a loader that a factory worker should be able to use is as complex as a workflow on a computer can be. And that’s very explicitly accounting for the fact that loader’s or lift’s control panel doesn’t change every fucking day and the user remembers it, so computer UIs should be simpler than those of lifts and loaders!

        I design control panels. I try to keep the workflow consistent not because I see value in it, but because some asshole decided that they didn’t want to pay for retraining. Really I don’t care, having to retool slightly every decade or so is pretty reasonable. Especially given that the tech is always changing.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Especially given that the tech is always changing.

          Humans don’t. Changing things is fine, making using them more complex for the same result, because another decade has passed, is not.

          • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            It has to get more complicated, more edge cases have popped up and the process is more complicated.

            Look basic example. I made an uncoiler and needed to add in a reverse override. Why? Because someone one time loaded it in wrong.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              4 months ago

              By “more complex” I meant making other operations slower (EDIT: and harder to understand) for somebody using it, so - not this example.

  • elrik@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    4 months ago

    “Up to 20%” is meaningless for a headline and is pure click bait. It could be any number between 0% and 20%. Or put another way, any number from no time at all to a horrifying more than an entire day per week.

    Why not just state the average from what is probably a statistically irrelevant study and move on?

  • Zip2@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    Sounds more like a lot of people could do with some basic computer skills training.

  • CrowAirbrush@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    4 months ago

    How about everyone who has zero skills with these problems, do they count is 0% spent on them as they outsource it or do they count as 100% since the smallest problem incapacitates their computer usage?