• _number8_@lemmy.worldOPEnglish
      102·
      1 year ago

      yeah exactly, which is why it’s a bullshit buzzword. every piece of media creates parasocial relationships – the point of art is to feel a connection! people had parasocial relationships with the bible and homer and martin luther and walt whitman and orwell and twitter and facebook and podcasts.

      people love to demonize it because the word sort of sounds like ‘parasite’ but everyone has multiple parasocial relationships if the bar is basically ‘you think a person on tv is cool’

      • SkyeStarfall@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
        61·
        1 year ago

        Ehm, no, the criticism for parasocial relationships isn’t that you’re a “parasite”, it’s that it can be unhealthy for you if you’re not careful. (Unless the parasite is targeted at the media person, in which case some do exploit this for profit and fame)

        And it’s more than just liking a media person. It’s about feeling as if they are a friend that you personally know, and treat them like that.

        • mosiacmango@lemm.eeEnglish
          3·
          1 year ago

          The media didn’t use to be interactive, which is really where the relationships turned toxic. Radio might have pitched you cigarettes and slimming drinks, but it didn’t reply to comments, beg for likes, call out donors names mid broadcast, give you cute little pieces of flair to show off, on and on.

          Parasocialability is now part of the intrinsic economy of the celebrity/fan relationship on the internet, and with most things you mix with capitalism, has been amped up to insane levels to maximize profit. It’s unhealthy because unhealthy produces income along with the fanatics.