• cerevant@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have to disagree - this is more like the gate that blocks the sidewalk that you can get around by walking on the grass. The mechanical locks that these come with are significantly weaker, more common and better understood by thieves, that they wouldn’t bother even trying to figure out how to hack the smart lock.

    • moody@lemmings.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      That doesn’t invalidate their point. The electronic lock is just an additional potential point of failure with no added security. In addition to people who can pick or break the key lock, now there is an additional type of person who can break in: the kind that knows how to bypass electronic locks.

    • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same concept but why pick a lock when you can break a window or sliding glass door?

      In other words… The attack surface is indeed larger for smart lock than dumb lock – more ways to attack – but in practice it matters little because existing home attack surface is easily breached.

      • agent_flounder@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        PS the counter argument is smart locks come with added security controls: monitoring, logging, and the ability to auto lock in case someone forgets to lock it.