Could be the type of pet, the breed, how they behave, their relationship…anything about the pet that informs you on their human.

  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    49
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    If stray cats in a town are friendly, that means the community is friendly. If they’re timid, beware the people.

    • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Cat’s in urban areas that aren’t socialized are always skittish. It’s about not being socialized to humans are a critical age. The areas that you are finding “friendly” strays are where people abandon former pets. Former pets were socialized at the critical age and want human contact.

      Basically you are describing areas with shitty humans as areas with superior humans.

        • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 months ago

          If your little murder floof is on walkabout, it’s either unplanned or you need to re-examine things. If you want fewer mosquitoes, keep your cats inside 100% – that’s almost a binary choice.

          The world has changed; and any cat outside should be seen as the indication of a problem. Also, depending where you are - eg k2k - the coyotes or similar indigenes will handle things in ways you don’t want.

          • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Cats still do well outdoors in rural areas. Disneyworld is proof of this. Every night, Disneyworld fills to the brim with cats, and the park decided to use this to their advantage to keep mice out. They don’t live as long living their life outdoors, but it’s not urgently harmful to them either.

          • ITGuyLevi@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            I, like many, will have to disagree. This is just my personal opinion though.

            One of our cats we let out whenever she wants, she desires being outside and I can’t seem to steal that freedom from her. I know it’s more dangerous outside, but she was a stray for the first couple years of her life and is probably more aware of the dangers than most people. Now she mainly just sleeps in a chair on our porch watching birds.

            Our other kitty has always had a home and loves outside, but only goes out on a leash (before her I honestly didn’t think a cat would use a leash).

            • The Stoned Hacker@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              7
              ·
              4 months ago

              I think the main issue with outdoor cats isn’t even the danger posed to the cats; it’s the danger the cats pose to everything else. Numerous species — especially birds — have gone extinct specifically because of cats. It’s one thing to have a barn cat or mouser, but cats wreak havoc on ecosystems. And iirc, indoor cats have a lot longer life expectancy than outdoor cats. I understand wanting to give freedom to our furry friends, but cats hunt for fun and are basically murderous little fluffballs to anything smaller or similar size than them.

              • Vandals_handle@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                4 months ago

                Recent numbers I’ve seen estimate domestic and feral cats kill billions of song birds annually. As you mentioned avian insectivores help keep flying insect numbers in balance. Cats also predate beneficial reptiles and amphibians. Even the mice, gophers and other small mammals cats kill fill a niche in a habitat, killing them can weaken the food web.

        • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          The majority of human beings live in urban areas where its ridiculously unsafe for cats. In the city every outdoor cat is either abandoned or feral and neither particularly long for this world.

          Outdoor cats live about 3-5 years, indoor cats live 10-20. Again shitty humans.

          • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            3-5 years, indoor cats live 10-20

            Atomic family has amassed 60 years total working SPCA/Vet/etc . They can all confirm it’s that bad.

          • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            That, as you implied, depends on the environment. In a safe rural setting, which are not as depopulated as one would think (would people complain of rural America for example if it was a drop in the bucket), it’s more like one to three years less than the average indoor cat.

            • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              4 months ago

              Good think we don’t have to make up the answers when we can look them up!

              14% of Americans live in rural settings

              https://www.ers.usda.gov/webdocs/publications/102576/eib-230.pdf

              (warning large pdf) search for text 14 percent its on page 4.

              The more comfortable life of an indoor cat significantly increases his lifespan. An indoor cat may live 15-17 years, while the life expectancy for outdoor cats is only 2-5 years, according to researchers at University of California-Davis.

              https://www.petmd.com/cat/care/can-indoor-cat-be-part-time-outdoor-cat

              It really is very very bad. rural areas may have less traffic but they also have more wild animals

              • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                4 months ago

                There are whole US states that are nothing but rural. 14% definitely doesn’t sound right, unless they have a high bar for what’s considered rural. Wild animals are definitely a thing, but only a few of the rarer ones to find in a quiet neighborhood setting are going to desire a fight with a cat. Dogs are more likely to meet their end outside because they’re the ones that go around picking the fights with other animals.

                • michaelmrose@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  1
                  ·
                  4 months ago

                  It’s weird that you respond to actual information based on what your feels tell you.

                  There are whole US states that are nothing but rural

                  There are in fact not. Smaller states still have cities and people tend to be concentrated around those cities ND the very definition of a shit hole state with nothing in it. 85% of its meager population lives in the metro areas surrounding its 5 biggest (for ND) cities. The other 15% live in the other 99% of the state.

                  Lets look at a population density map to better visualize this. https://www.census.gov/library/visualizations/2021/geo/population-distribution-2020.html

                  Outdoor cats just don’t live near as long on average. This isn’t about your feels its about reality its about stats.

                  Regarding the safety of rural areas. Dogs kill cats, cats kill other cats, raccoons kill cats, eagles and other predatory birds kill cats, cars kill cats, eating poisoned nuisance animals kills cats, coyotes kill cats.

                  • Call me Lenny/Leni@lemm.ee
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    4 months ago

                    shit hole state

                    Feels, huh?

                    Concentrations =/= ceasing to be rural

                    I’m from VT, we’re rural enough in the sense that our “cities” have an average of a few thousand people in them, challenging your notion/definition here.

                    I didn’t say cats don’t shorten their lives by being outside, I was saying it’s not as significant a game changer as you make it out to be.

                    Except for dogs which are typically kept from being outside, of all the animals mentioned there, coyotes and eagles and other predatory birds are rare in town limits and raccoons don’t attack for no reason unless it has rabies, which itself is rare. So is poisoned food since it became illegal to poison potential prey animals (how many animals do you see dead after having eaten poisoned prey). Cars will be a threat if the street is busy and the driver doesn’t stop, but that’s not necessitated. Silliest of all is you saying cats kill other cats, which happens rarely as there is no reason.

                    The so-called 15% who have been doing this for ages without being swarmed about it by the feds can attest this is normal and does not have the impact those who claim to speak for the 85% claim it has.