• ArcticDagger@feddit.dkOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    I think that hypothesis still holds as it has always assumed training data of sufficient quality. This study is more saying that the places where we’ve traditionally harvested training data from are beginning to be polluted by low-quality training data

        • HowManyNimons@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          File it under “too good to happen”. Most writing jobs are proofreading AI-generated shit these days. We’ll need to wait until there’s real money in writing scripts to de-pollute content.