• ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    3 months ago

    So the only valid digits are arabic numbers but arabic script numbers are not a valid digit?

    Some people writing Regex implementations have that opinion. I’ve refrained from saying mine.

    If we want programming to be inclusive then doesn’t that make sense to also include the arabic script number?

    Maybe. IMO, number tests should be chosen/implemented based on the project’s requirements. If you want to include every Unicode character or string pattern anyone’s ever used to convey a numeric value, that would be a long and growing list. Arguably, it’s impossible: the word “elf” means a number if interpreted as German for “eleven” but not if interpreted as English for 🧝.

    • bitfucker@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, but “elf” are not digits. Digits are a symbol abstracted from the language itself. Does 5 and V convey different meanings in the context of digits? And yeah, I can see why they would argue about the implementation because inclusivity is important. Especially when designing a language implementation. If you are designing it wrong, it will be very hard to extend it in the future. But for application level implementation, go nuts.

      • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        You are right, “elf” is a stretch, it does not make sense to parse it as a number. But in some languages, the string “15 240,5” is just how a number is written (yes, that’s a U+2009 THIN SPACE, you can’t stop me from using it as a thousand separator in German). Obviously, despite having a , on their numpads, German programmers still expect computers to parse numbers with decimal dots and interpret commas as list values.

        • bitfucker@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Alright, maybe you misunderstood the term digits with numbers. When parsing a digit, you do not attach semantic yet to the building blocks. A \d regex parser does not care that the string “555” is not equivalent to “VVV”. All it cares about is that there is the digit “5” or “V”. In the same vein, regex parser should not try to parse IV as a single symbol.

          • ChaoticNeutralCzech@feddit.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            It’s not just digits. Nobody is expecting it to understand language yet but the parser is-number still returns true for "2e3" or "0x0F". It tells you whether the string can be interpreted as a real numeric value.

            • bitfucker@programming.dev
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              Yeah, hence is-“number”. But we were talking about regex are we. A number representation can use digits but it can also not. Much like how you make a number using the word “elf”.

        • bitfucker@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 months ago

          As I said, a digit is a symbol. Much like how we use letters to compose words, digits are used to construct numbers. When you start to repeat or reuse the symbol then it is no longer a singular symbol (what regex \d does). Hence my comments on why arabic script are one of the understandable debates since i18n is a valid concern as much as a11y is.