• PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S [he/him]@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    67
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    3 months ago

    Say it is a predictive llm

    According to the paper cited by the article OP posted, there is no LLM in the model. If I read it correctly, the paper says that it uses PyTorch’s implementation of ResNet18, a deep convolutional neural network that isn’t specifically designed to work on text. So this term would be inaccurate.

    or a pattern recognition model.

    Much better term IMO, especially since it uses a convolutional network. But since the article is a news publication, not a serious academic paper, the author knows the term “AI” gets clicks and positive impressions (which is what their job actually is) and we wouldn’t be here talking about it.

    • FierySpectre@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      Well, this is very much an application of AI… Having more examples of recent AI development that aren’t ‘chatgpt’(/transformers-based) is probably a good thing.

      • wewbull@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        3 months ago

        Op is not saying this isn’t using the techniques associated with the term AI. They’re saying that the term AI is misleading, broad, and generally not desirable in a technical publication.

        • FierySpectre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          3 months ago

          Op is not saying this isn’t using the techniques associated with the term AI.

          Correct, also not what I was replying about. I said that using AI in the headline here is very much correct. It is after all a paper using AI to detect stuff.