• frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        4 months ago

        For end users, sure. It’s specifically designed as a lower level interface that’s harder for developers to implement.

        • ILikeBoobies@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          Windows users use DXVK to boost framerates, it was the solution for making Elden Ring playable it’s first month

          I would say at that point the cost/reward is worth it

        • merthyr1831@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          True, though for most game/graphics developers you’re never interfacing directly with the graphics API, you’ll let your chosen engine/library do the heavy lifting.

          It does have the downsides of increasing the barrier to entry for custom/bespoke engines but those edge cases seem to be covered well by DXVK.

      • zalgotext@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Right? Dude Vulkan has impressed me a bunch lately. I use it for Deadlock and it feels much smoother than the streamers I see using DirectX, which is crazy since Deadlock is super early alpha. More stuff needs to support Vulkan

      • Olgratin_Magmatoe@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        Even so, having more software natively supported will always be a good thing. Half the reason why people drag their feet on switching to Linux is because of the lack of support for their favorite software.