• 稲荷大神の狐@yiffit.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It is a hard fork not a soft fork. Like Alma and Oracle, it will not be 1:1 binary compatible with RHEL anymore.

      All forks previously were 1:1 binary compatible meaning they were soft forks.

      Since RHEL killed the soft forks, making 1:1 RHEL clones impossible, all hard forks will divert from RHEL to do their own thing now.

    • Sjoerd1993@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      They’re not hunting for forks one by one, instead they don’t release the source code anymore for non-costumers of RHEL, effectively killing off hard forks.

      • Hovenko@iusearchlinux.fyi
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Ah I see. Makes sense. SO what Suse is planning to do is to start at the fork point and just maintain it their own way ?

        • Sjoerd1993@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          As far as I know they are planning to maintain it their own way. But I’m not exactly sure about the details on how compatible with RHEL they plan it to be in the future, how it will affect their own enterprise release in the long term.