• darcy@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    92
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    1 year ago

    haskell: “you submitted your math work instead of an essay”

    javascript: “this is awful, but at least i can read it anywhere i like”

    lisp: “it is not grammatically correct to nest brackets so much”

    lua: “your vocabulary is too limited and you have the writing skills of a child”

    rust: “omg. your essay is fast, safe, and perfect in every way! A+”

    css: “this is beautiful, but it doesnt say anything”

    • starman@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      C#: did you just copy Java’s essay and put your name on it?

      COBOL: why it looks like it’s from 16th century?

      PHP: I did not ask for a spaghetti recipe

      alternative Rust: it’s great, but I asked for an essay, not “🔥 Blazingly fast rust-based EssayOS”

        • 30p87@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          C# is Java except from Microsoft, which means it’s designed and much more integrated with Windows. The official .net core even brings telemetry right out of the box. Using C# apps on Linux is a pain, which is very bad considering it’s supposed to be like Java - compile once, run anywhere - except Java actually achieves it.

          Also, Minecraft runs on Java. Therefore, C# is useless. Boom, destroyed /s

      • raubarno@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Rust v3: “It’s three hours and I’m still compiling dependencies”

        EDIT: Also, “What does Option[Arc[Mutex[BTreeMap[String, Box[RefCell[Box[amp mut F>>>>>>> where F : Fn(T) -> U in your essay mean?” (srry, I didn’t come up with a better obscure data type, it’s probably gibberish)

        EDIT2: Lemmy deletes ‘less than’ sign for some damn reason (time to build Lemmy at home?)

        • eestileib@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          My friend partially explained how the build safety system worked for Rust and my first reaction was “holy shit the link stage must take a century”.

          “Yes.”

        • kattenluik@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I don’t think you should criticize a language that you clearly have not even learnt the syntax of. Dependencies are also a one-time compile and linking just your own program or library does not take very long, and if you’ve ever worked with C languages it’s all the same.

          Just because you don’t know how to read a languages syntax doesn’t mean it’s bad, it’s just like how you have to learn anything else. Rust is quite self-explanatory afterwards.

          • raubarno@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            I do write Rust projects

            EDIT: Well, it depends. If you statically compile everything with C build systems, in that sense, the speed should not differ from generic cargo workload. Although, in most cases, projects written in C are dynamically linked due to several reasons, one of which is code speed. In practice, even huge projects written in C (30k to 10k LOC) build quicker than C++ or Rust.

            I’m not pooping on generics, either. Generics is a saviour for correctness and performance. Yet, I want to point out the type creep is still a thing, even though there’s little we can do about it.

            Anyways, this thread should be better interpreted with humor, instead of technical accuracy.

            • kattenluik@feddit.nl
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              Fair, I just don’t like it even when it’s humorous as it still speaks of a language in a bad way.

              Also, if you use a Unix system to build your projects I can recommend you check out Mold if you haven’t yet as it speeds up the linking significantly.

      • 30p87@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Ha, such a loser. Real programmers use C.ԥ[��\�q��r��8-߿�ʱT�xd]�UG���S;���v�o������ՠ��N�iYts~fv���@ֿ��Qj�\�Q��“�$�:� �����0��y��G�6�K!{Ȯ������Z�n�˭s�\��ڣ�:J��1���e�k=�${�Z�3�k67D�����K���(�P.��v�0��a�����d���6e?=�v�)���a*��bF���R��4>�˕�G�=��v-�dP��O�3��+A�nw�|ъ�f۽b�oF�I`‘�#��:��̴g>�j:^���O�mu^U�l�A�oI�’�.��j>Dm\����y��2T��8w�D"1������ת«Q����l�”�C�{���*�����% ��A�߸�=t��� �X��m�9R�x��)�a�-���tbL�����Ǣs��d$oMZ��4I1jXD���
        Segmentation fault

        • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          Rust may be good and all, but I doubt it’s magically always write good A+ code, I’m sure some developers will slap all their code inside unsafe as a shortcut.

    • MonkderZweite@feddit.ch
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      javascript: “this is awful, but at least i can read it anywhere i like”

      There are only 3 engines capable of interpreting most of it.

      • darcy@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        1 year ago

        it can run on almost any browser, it can be bundled to run on desktop or mobile. i know wasm exists but javascript is still sadly an extremely versatile language, mostly due to its support on the web