• Saledovil@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    2 months ago

    It’s sort of a strange approach, because this will leave you with the workers who can’t find employment elsewhere.

      • Skeezix@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 months ago

        Most companies are satisfied with adequate workers rather than diligent and empowered workers. The latter cost too much. This is a convenient way for Amazon to cull the crew without incurring bad PR. This is why it’s often a shitshow in offices and warehouses; because the workers with self esteem and motivation either get fed up and leave or are forced out. This is just a facet of Big Capitalism.

    • exanime@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      2 months ago

      By the time that negative effect kicks in, the execs already cashed in their bonuses and are on their way out of the sinking ship

    • Semi-Hemi-Lemmygod@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 months ago

      Executives do not see workers as people with skillsets. They’re numbers on a spreadsheet. And having ten highly paid workers quit “voluntarily” makes the numbers do good things.

      Actually, they’re not even numbers on a spreadsheet. They’re data points in a graph. Executives don’t have time to understand numbers, let alone people.

    • DrDickHandler@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 months ago

      People exaggerate this claim. Amazon already accounted for some talent leaving and the benefits obviously outweighs the con. There is nothing strange.